Its simply a toe hold on a very wide beach to fight Anti – Semitism – thus a beginning of Nationalize American Jewry only.

The following reproduction of President Trump’s executive order — published in the previous post — is simply a beginning to engage legal protections where they are needed for American Jewry to express their beliefs. Whether those beliefs are either spiritual observances, or secular — its national tendencies — both are now within the federal arm of being protected.

The scope of American Jewry being a national identity is an ongoing effort in an attempt to find common ground; and thus there are several disputes of what is Jewish, or Israeli nationality, or not.



Trump’s order avoids this completely in as much as its intent is to back those who willing to express their Jewish views when desired to do so.

It is also certain that mainstream media wishes to complicate what is entailed in the order itself.

Simply by Trump’s acknowledge recognition through his step son’s Jewish self – views, along with his beloved daughter, and as a loving father he has accepted their views of being connected with that part of America Jewry who considers themselves as a nationality circumspected by Jewish observances.

Thus with a personal connection rooted in a portion of American Jewry the key interpretation to protect freedom of Jewish consciousness from those who attempt to forbid such public expressions and freedoms are now having limited protections as per the scope of the Civil Rights acts of 1964-. From both a perspective of a loving father, and by, likewise, recognizing a greater diversity within American Jewry, and as President, the use of nationality is legitimate Jewishly – though limited by American Jewish consensus.

Simply both the Jewish wide diversity ethos, along with its narrow construed personal Jewish choice of a national identity, both, as whole, are now equally protected.  Protected especially within American academia to public campus debates with each other of what is Jewish destiny. Thus the need to be protected, as increasingly campus administration have refused to protect both free campus Jewish expressions by administrative campus protections, and their additional responsibilities to allow free Jewish Life Styles to be a part of their campus diversities; this the real cause of Trump’s action communicated by Jewish family relations.

President Trump’s executive order to fight campus Anti – Semitism

All News
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy. My Administration is committed to combating the rise of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incidents in the United States and around the world. Anti-Semitic incidents have increased since 2013, and students, in particular, continue to face anti Semitic harassment in schools and on university and college campuses.


Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance. While Title VI does not cover discrimination based on religion, individuals who face discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin do not lose protection under Title VI for also being a member of a group that shares common religious practices. Discrimination against Jews may give rise to a Title VI violation when the discrimination is based on an individual’s race, color, or national origin.
It shall be the policy of the executive branch to enforce Title VI against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in anti-Semitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by Title VI.
Sec. 2. Ensuring Robust Enforcement of Title VI. (a) In enforcing Title VI, and identifying evidence of discrimination based on race, color, or national origin, all executive departments and agencies (agencies) charged with enforcing Title VI shall consider the following:
(i) the non-legally binding working definition of anti Semitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which states, “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”; and
(ii) the “Contemporary Examples of Anti-Semitism” identified by the IHRA, to the extent that any examples might be useful as evidence of discriminatory intent.
(b) In considering the materials described in subsections (a)(i) and (a)(ii) of this section, agencies shall not diminish or infringe upon any right protected under Federal law or under the First Amendment. As with all other Title VI complaints, the inquiry into whether a particular act constitutes discrimination prohibited by Title VI will require a detailed analysis of the allegations.
Sec. 3. Additional Authorities Prohibiting Anti-Semitic Discrimination. Within 120 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency charged with enforcing Title VI shall submit a report to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, identifying additional nondiscrimination authorities within its enforcement authority with respect to which the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism could be considered.
Sec. 4. Rule of Construction. Nothing in this order shall be construed to alter the evidentiary requirements pursuant to which an agency makes a determination that conduct, including harassment, amounts to actionable discrimination, or to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
December 11, 2019.